Blogpost

This is your visit to this webpage.


Follow the Launch of The
2024 Macro Economic Outlook
Learn More


Posted Thu, Aug 24, 2023 12:59 PM

The decision-making process within the context of election petitions in Nigeria

The decision-making process of the Election Tribunal in Nigeria involves a comprehensive analysis of the evidence presented, the application of legal principles, the consideration of precedents, and the determination of whether the petitioner has met the burden of proof. The tribunal's decision has a significant impact on the outcome of the election dispute and plays a crucial role in upholding the integrity of the electoral process.

1. Evaluation of Evidence: The decision-making process of the Election Tribunal involves a thorough evaluation of the evidence presented during the hearing. This evidence includes witness testimonies, documentary materials, expert opinions, and any other relevant materials that have been submitted by the parties involved in the dispute.

2. Application of Legal Principles: The tribunal considers the legal principles, laws, and regulations that apply to the case. This includes constitutional provisions, electoral laws, judicial precedents, and any other relevant legal guidelines that shape the framework for determining the validity of the election results and the allegations made in the petition.

3. Precedent and Case Law: The tribunal may refer to previous court decisions and case law that address similar issues or principles. This practice helps ensure consistency in decision-making and reinforces the principle of stare decisis, where decisions in previous cases serve as binding precedents for future cases.

4. Burden of Proof: In the decision-making process, the tribunal takes into account which party has met the burden of proof. The petitioner is typically responsible for demonstrating that there were electoral irregularities, malpractices, or other grounds for challenging the election results. The strength of evidence presented by each party influences the tribunal's determination.

5. Findings of Fact: The tribunal assesses the credibility and reliability of witness testimonies and other evidence presented. It determines the veracity of the claims made by the parties and makes findings of fact based on the evidence before it.

6. Application of Law to Facts: Once the tribunal has established the facts of the case, it applies the relevant legal principles to those facts. This involves analyzing how the evidence aligns with the legal requirements for election validity, fairness, and compliance with electoral laws.

7. Deciding on the Petition: Based on the evidence, legal principles, and the tribunal's evaluation, the Election Tribunal makes a decision regarding the validity of the election results and the allegations made in the petition. The decision may include various outcomes such as upholding the election results, annulling the election, ordering a re-run, or taking any other appropriate actions.

8. Majority Decision: In cases where the Election Tribunal is composed of multiple judges, the decision is often reached through a majority vote. The judges deliberate and discuss their perspectives on the evidence and legal issues before coming to a consensus on the final decision.

9. Written Judgment: The decision of the tribunal is typically conveyed in the form of a written judgment. This judgment includes the tribunal's findings of fact, the legal analysis, and the rationale behind the decision. A well-reasoned judgment is crucial for transparency, accountability, and the parties' understanding of the tribunal's reasoning.

10. Appeals Process: The decision of the Election Tribunal can be appealed by either party to higher courts, such as the Court of Appeal and, ultimately, the Supreme Court. The appeals process allows for further review of the decision and ensures that justice is upheld through multiple levels of judicial scrutiny.

Find a blog post